There was plenty of noise over the weekend about the Obama Administration's decision to send 5 assholes to New York City for a trial that is all but guaranteed to end in death sentences. People who have no idea what they are talking about (see: Rudy "We generally don't bring people back to the scene of the crime for justice" Giuliani) aired out their thoughts so the rest of us who don't know what they are talking about can turn an academic debate into an ideological and political game of Blue vs. Red.My thoughts are this are pretty simple: People who commit crimes should be punished in a just manner. Since these clowns aren't denying their role in 9/11 it won't be difficult to ensure justice is done, but it should be done on our terms, not theirs. The reason we don't have martyrs in this country is because we have transparency in our legal system. We have checks and balances. The accused have the right to defend themselves. Incidentally, all these attributes are parts of the reason America is a target of radicals. People with hate in their hearts can't accept the principles of freedom and democracy. I haven't heard a good reason yet why these murderers should received any special treatment and not be brought to justice in NYC. I'm sure there are plenty of issues that could be debated by legal experts over this but all I hear from politicians is noise.
And trying to think about the issues created by having a dual-trial system, one in the Federal courts system and the other by military commission, just makes my head hurt. Will the smartest people in the room please stand up and explain this to the rest of us?













